|
| |
Institutional structure at the supranational level (II)
| How this section is structured |
|
European Court of Justice
|
Tasks and responsibilities of the ECJ |
The
European Court of Justice (ECJ), just like the European Parliament,
sounds familiar to systems existing in national states.
Indeed, its power of jurisdiction also corresponds to that often found
in national democratic political systems. The ECJ is responsible for
making sure Community law is upheld. It is responsible for ruling on
legal disputes between member states, on disputes between the EU and member states, on disputes between EU
institutions and authorities as well as on disputes between individual
citizens and the Union. In addition to this, judges in member states
can turn to the Court of Justice to rule on pending cases involving the
interpretation of Community law.
As
you can see from the illustration, there is also a Court of First
Instance that exists alongside the Court of Justice. The Court of First
Instance was established in 1989 to ease the Court of Justice's
workload. Its jurisdiction includes direct actions from citizens and
companies against the actions or failure of EU bodies to act, as well as action for damages against the EU.
The illustration also demonstrates that employment conflicts between the EU and its employees have been handled by the Civil Service Tribunal since the autumn of 2005.

|
|
Way of calling in the ECJ |
There
are two ways of calling in the ECJ. The first is over the preliminary
rulings procedure, which permits national courts to apply for an
interpretation of certain aspects of Community law to help these
national courts to reach a decision on a current case. The second way
is over direct petitions. |
|
ECJ with huge influence over the development of the EU |
But its actual influence only really becomes clear after
taking a look at its work in individual areas. The European Court of
Justice has been a major influencing factor in making the constitution
of the EU more supranational by laying down rules such as the principle of direct effect - which means for every citizen without having to call in national states first - of EU law and the primacy of Community law over national law. We have already touched upon these milestones during our journey through the history and development of the EU in Basic Course 2 Moreover, the European Court of Justice has also had a large bearing on other areas of EU policy. For example, in a revolutionary ruling it established the principle of mutual
recognition of standards in other member states, which put an end to
the extremely slow and time-consuming process of harmonising standards
and, in turn, went a long way to making the internal market project
possible. One of the main reasons for the ECJ's influence came as a
result of a clever, targeted and successful strategy to incorporate the
national courts into the administration of EU justice.
Looking at this, it might be easy to get the impression that these
landmark decisions were made in the past and that they can no longer be
taken to reflect the influence of the ECJ today. A more recent judgement
(November 2005), however, demonstrates that it would be quite wrong to
get this impression. This judgement might lead to the Commission
gaining influence in the area of criminal law and has led to heated
discussions. To find out more about this decision, click on the link
above (the page will open in a new window). |
|
Summary and assessment |
In making an assessment it
has to be concluded that the ECJ, even when compared to other
influential national constitutional courts such as the Supreme Court in
the U.S. or the Federal Constitutional Court in Germany, carries weight
and has provided the integration process with significant stimulus. The
role of the Court and the legal system for which it has been primarily
responsible are without any doubt among the most outstanding
characteristics of the EU's "supranationality", a supranationality that fundamentally sets it apart from all other international organisations. |
[Back to top of page]
European Council
|
An overview of the European Council |
The European Council is an institution that stands over the three pillars of the EU,
that links them together and that takes on a central leadership role.
Here, too, things become significantly clearer by taking a look at the
illustration below.
 |
|
Development of the European Council
Summit meetings held by heads of state and government
|
If
the Council of Ministers has always been embodied in the European
Treaty, the same does not apply for the European Council. The European
Council was established as a result of the summit meetings involving
Heads of State and Governments which have been taking place since 1969.
These meetings used to take place at irregular intervals; a resolution
passed at the Paris Summit Conference in 1974 made them a permanent
fixture in the shape of the European Council, yet they were not
embodied in the Treaty establishing the European Community. The
European Council deals with the central issues effecting the EU,
in particular those connected with European Political Cooperation (EPC)
which is an institution founded in 1970 at intergovernmental level in
an attempt to coordinate foreign policy. Because of its composition,
the European Council developed into the highest decision-making
authority - although this was not intended by the treaties. |
|
Since the Treaty of Maastricht: setting the guidelines for the development of the Union |
Its
role was made more explicit with the Single European Act (SEA) in
1986/87. The Treaty of Maastricht on European Union followed on from
this, confirming the Council's function of driving forward European
union as a whole and locking together the different policy areas.
Article D of the Treaty establishing the European Union states: "The
European Council shall provide the Union with the necessary impetus for
its development and shall define the general political guidelines
thereof". This applies in particular for the guidelines concerning
Common Foreign and Security Policy, with the Treaty of Amsterdam, which
came into force on the 1st of May 1999, even providing for
policy-making power over the Western European Union. The European
Council is also regularly engaged when the ministers of departments in
the Council of Ministers are unable to reach agreement and package
deals which stretch across policy areas become necessary. |
|
Summary |
There
is no doubt that the European Council as the European Union's dedicated
body for reflecting the intergovernmental components of the Union has
gained a great deal of influence over the past few decades. Indeed,
following the introduction of the new constitution, which, since the
"No" votes from the referendums in France and the Netherlands, has
failed for the time being, would have increased even more. Having said
this, however, it would be wrong to conclude that there was a general
trend in the EU towards more intergovernmentalism.
The details that we have provided about the Court of Justice and in
particularly the overview provided in Basic Courses 2 and 3 on how the
integration process has developed, have made it very clear indeed that
there has been a simultaneous trend towards supranationality. Indeed,
the simultaneous nature of thee opposite developments is also reflected
in the construction of the complicated institutional structure, which
is truly unique in its character. According to the learning
goals that we set at the beginning of this Main Subject Group, I have
kept my focus concentrated on the five main bodies at the EU level during our look at the institutions. Basic information on the remaining institutions at a supranational level can be found online. One of a large number of sources is the European Union Website. |
[Author: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schumann]
[Back to top of page]
|